Afghanistan: Where we came in
Wednesday, December 17th, 2008US News and World Report has an article saying that the Pentagon is considering paying and arming Afghan militias. Back in the late 1980’s President Carter, of all people, started doing this too. He was concerned (or was influenced by Zbigniew Brzezinski’s concern) about the modern reform socialist government that had overthrown the old king and was running the country. This government had close ties to Russia which justified overthrowing them apparently.
When Reagan took office, he continued that covert program and expanded it sending funds and weapons. (See the movie Charlie Wilson’s War for one side of that story and several “60 minutes” reports for another.) The warlords and their private armies (let’s call them as they are, not militias) succeeded in defeating Russia in Afghanistan with the help of U.S. funds and weapons. But, this also had the side effect of creating the Taliban - a fundamentalist theocracy not noted for its tolerance or friendly attitudes. And Al Queda was created by the Taliban to export that theocracy to the rest of the world.
According to Wikipedia and other sources, the Taliban’s leaders were actually under the pay of the U.S. till sometime in 1999 under Clinton. Of course, in September of 2001 they memorably rejected our support with hijacked transport category aircraft. We are now considering defensive measures for the Stinger missles we gave to the Mujahideen.
We started with some of the least educated and most close-minded of Afghanistan society. We ended up the same way. It’s not a great leap of imagination to see the connection. Although the specifics could not have been clear, the boomerang effect was entirely predictable.
I know it is not traditional but just once, damn it, I would like to see American foreign policy take into account the long-term results of our meddlesome efforts. It is stupid for us to spend each new generation repairing the “misadventures” of the last.